XMFH01 vs XMFH02: Choosing a Honeycomb Paper Wrapping Machine
2026-10-20 11:10
The choice between a manual and an automatic honeycomb paper machine starts with one task: bringing opened wrapping paper to the product. A manual dispenser makes that task part of the operator’s pulling motion. A powered machine adds a driven paper feed. Both approaches can belong at a packing bench, but they suit different working rhythms and require different equipment arrangements.
Recycle Paking offers the XMFH01 manual honeycomb paper dispenser and the XMFH02 powered honeycomb wrapping machine. Comparing these specific models gives buyers a clearer decision than choosing equipment simply because it is described as automatic.

Published equipment differences
| Feature | XMFH01 | XMFH02 |
|---|---|---|
| Paper feed | Manual pull | Powered output |
| Listed machine size | 660 × 240 × 220 mm | 595 × 320 × 243 mm |
| Net weight | 7 kg | 13 kg |
| Published powered feed speed | Not applicable | 8 m/min |
| Rated electrical power | Not listed for this manual model | 150 W |
| Pedal option | Not listed | Optional foot pedal |
The specifications come from the official XMFH01 dispenser page and XMFH02 machine page. The XMFH02 dimensions above are converted from the published centimetre values; these are machine dimensions, separate from shipping-carton dimensions.
XMFH01: the operator controls paper delivery directly
The XMFH01 uses a desktop frame to hold the roll while the operator draws out the honeycomb wrapping paper. Paper delivery follows the hand movement used to prepare the wrap. The packer selects how much to pull for the item, wraps it, and separates the required section by hand. This creates a direct connection between the product being handled and the amount of paper drawn.
That arrangement can suit a retail dispatch bench or an intermittent wrapping position where packing is one of several jobs. The operator may answer an order query, assemble a carton, and then return to wrapping. A manually supplied sheet can fit those pauses naturally. The relevant benefit is control of an occasional task, rather than an assumed daily production threshold.

XMFH02: a motor supplies the wrapping paper
The XMFH02 adds powered paper output. Recycle Paking describes a rotary paper-feed control and a start button, with a foot pedal available as an option. This changes how paper is called forward: the operator can use the machine’s feed function while organizing the wrapping task. The motor supplies paper; product positioning and wrapping remain part of the operator’s work.
Powered feed becomes relevant when drawing paper is a frequent, repeated action at a dedicated station. For example, an operator wrapping a sequence of similarly shaped products can organize a repeatable cycle around paper delivery, product placement, and transfer to the carton. The optional pedal offers another way to request output when that control arrangement suits the sequence.

Plan for the machine, rolls, and wrapping area
The two models have different listed dimensions and weights, so they should not be treated as interchangeable objects on a bench plan. Leave room for the loaded roll, accessible replenishment, the emerging paper, and the product itself. The front collection area needs enough clear space for a useful section of wrap to open before it is brought around the item.
For a shared workstation, consider how frequently the equipment will be repositioned and where its supply will be kept. For the powered model, include the electrical connection and, when ordered, the pedal cable in that layout. Keep those connections clear of the normal route for cartons and operators. A machine that fits on the tabletop still needs room for the wrapping process around it.
Match the feed method to the work being done
At a bench with irregular orders and frequent pauses, the XMFH01 offers a straightforward manual feed arrangement. At a dedicated wrapping position with repeated demand for paper, the XMFH02 provides a powered alternative. These are application choices: the number of orders alone does not describe how much time an operator spends drawing paper or how the rest of the station is organized.
A practical comparison considers where the operator spends the wrapping cycle. If selecting products, assembling cartons, or arranging several items occupies most of that cycle, powered paper delivery may affect only a small part of the work. Where repeated paper pulling is a substantial activity, motorized output deserves closer attention. This helps connect the equipment choice to a specific task.
What does the XMFH02 speed tell you?
The listed 8 m/min describes the machine’s paper-feed speed. It does not establish how many finished orders one person can wrap in a minute. Item shape, the chosen wrapping method, carton preparation, and handling all remain part of the complete packing cycle. Use the speed to understand the feed mechanism’s role within that cycle.
Choose a specific model for your station
Recycle Paking’s Honeycomb Paper Solution range includes both equipment approaches. For a quotation, contact Recycle Paking with the model you are considering, representative product dimensions, available bench space, and destination country. If choosing the XMFH02, state whether the optional foot pedal is required so the requested configuration is clear.